Use PVSCSI or not for lower intensive workloads
Do I choose the PVSCSI or LSI Logic virtual adapter on ESX 4.0 for non-IO intensive workloads?
I thought that the question about using or not VMware Paravirtual adapter was solved with the vSphere 4 Update 1 and the announce that VMware has officialy support PVSCSI on boot disks. For me it was clear that I was going to use only this adapter for newly created VMs an those with LSI logic were on plan to be migrated. Sooner or later.
As I already blogged about the PVSCSI adapter greatly improves the throughput for heavy I/O workloads and and that also it consumes less CPU.
But then there was an interresting KB article from VMware which says that “it depends on your workload“…. 
They’ve done actualy some deep testing on that and the experiment results show that:
PVSCSI greatly improves the CPU efficiency and provides better throughput for heavy I/O workloads. For certain workloads, however, the ESX 4.0 implementation of PVSCSI may have a higher latency than LSI Logic if the workload drives low I/O rates or issues few outstanding I/Os.
They also have a solution for taking a decision whether Yes or Not use this adapter:
PVSCSI is best for workloads that drive more than 2000 IOPS and 8 outstanding I/Os.
LSI Logic is best for workloads that drive lower I/O rates and fewer outstanding I/Os.
So you’d have to go and test the IOPS for those VM’s that you think that should be migrated or not….
UPDATE: Scott Sauer has posted a “Deep dive” explanation on his blog. Make sure to check this out…
Source: VMware KB
Related Posts :
New test of PVSCSI adapter compared to LSI Logic SAS. Few weeks back I pointed out a VMware KB ...
VMware Paravirtualized SCSI (PVSCSI driver) Introduced with vSphere 4 this driver can speed ...
Speed up your Guest VM with paravirtual SCSI adapters: PVSCSI is part of vSphere 4 I wrote an a ...
How-to avoid BSOD (Blue Screen of Death) when you want to change from LSI Logic paralel into PVS ...
There has been held an Virtualization event in Prague (Czech Republic) the 3rd of this months ca ...
Other posts from Server Virtualization
- Disable web access on VMware vCenter
- VMware ESX - Configuration of Service console via CLI
- Basic VMware ESX CLI networking commands
- How to change the default location of updates in vCenter
- Did you know that ESX 3.5 general support will end in less than 90 days?
- Starwind iSCSI HA Connection to ESX Server
- See a list of Storage Array Type Plugins on ESX Server
- New whitepaper released on PVSCSI
- Enable Jumbo Frames in ESXi 4
- How-to troubleshoot iSCSI connection to your SAN
- Starwind with ISCSI SAN Software can do High Availability for you...
- Overview Video from the new vSphere Pro video training from Train Signal
- New upgrade webpage for ESXi 4 pushes us to the right direction?
- You know how to collect diag information when your ESXi does PSOD?
- Hardening guides for vSphere 4
- NTLDR missing - silly but can happend
- How To Shrink VMware Virtual Disk Files and disable shrinking
- vSphere Quick Start guide bonus download..
- ESXi - the past, the present and the future
- Farm commander - management tool for VI and TS or Citrix Farms
- How to collect log information from vCenter Server 4
- How to know where is my VM if vCenter is down?
- New patches for ESX 4 and ESXi 4
- Use VMware Converter to import 3rd party VMs, for example Virtual Iron's VMs
- Windows XP installation as a VM - trouble to see the disk or not?
- Vmware HCL for ESXi 4
- Time keeping for Windows VM's best practices
- Virtu-Al releasing 3rd update of PowerPack
- Not even tried Appspeed and new version is already available!
- Starwind active-active HA availability storage
My latest blogpost: Use PVSCSI or not for lower intensive workloads http://goo.gl/fb/GNXK
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Use PVSCSI or not for lower intensive workloads (ESX Virtualization) http://bit.ly/bSihSi
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
thanks for pointing to the KB
I have been reading KB that VMware is planning to phase out PVSCSI in 2010
PVSCSI is great when speaking about performances. I wish the caveats list will get shorter. One caveat being MSCS support especialy with Windows 2008 (SPC-3 an the Persistent Reservation thing).
More at http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsphere4/r40/vsp_40_admin_guide.pdf page 118
Didider,
The PDF, is there is an update for vSphere 4 Update 1? Because in this PDF one can read that the boot disks are not supported… That was the case before Update 1 was released…..
You’re right, latest document available at http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsphere4/r40_u1/vsp_40_u1_admin_guide.pdf page 117
Good info on when to use/not use the PVSCSI adapter in VMware vSphere: http://cli.gs/rMuNAh
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Should you use PVSCSI or not for lower intensive workloads? http://ow.ly/12AVO
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Is there a reasonable easy way to track # of outstanding I/Os? Just use Physical Disk -> Avg Disk Read Reqs / sec under perfmon for Windows?
This is good info but a bit disappointing to hear. Like VMXNET3 I was hoping to standardize all builds on the PVSCSI device but it sounds like that isn’t the best approach. You’re not going to see 2,000 IOPS on a server unless it’s pretty busy so most likely you won’t use this device often.
The other annoyance here is now you have to have multiple virtual machine templates for low and high I/O workloads. Throw in x86/x64 templates and suddenly I’m managing lots of templates.
Thanks for passing this along. Good info.